18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Imperial SnowDragon UHP (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Imperial (11%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 17% of the Imperial SnowDragon UHP. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Imperial SnowDragon UHP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the SnowDragon UHP were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Number of tests
49
6
Best position
#1
#9
Average position
3.2
24.7
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
244
68

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 23 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
99%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
97%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
96%
Dry handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
62%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
87%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
98%
Snow
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
83%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
76%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
74%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
79%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
92%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
95%
Ice
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
98%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
98%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
97%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
98%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
95%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
86%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2020205/55 R16View
Tyre ReviewsTyre Reviews
Winter
2021225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.