18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Imperial SnowDragon UHP (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Imperial (11%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 17% of the Imperial SnowDragon UHP. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Imperial SnowDragon UHP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the SnowDragon UHP were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Number of tests
49
6
Best position
#1
#9
Average position
3.2
24.7
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
244
68

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
53%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
53%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
45%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
64%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
22%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
81%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
86%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
76%
Snow Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
58%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
56%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
63%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
56%
Ice Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Ice Braking Abs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
78%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
81%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
85%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
77%
Economy
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
62%
Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
62%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.