8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (85%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 89% compared to 88% of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made in Korea and CrossClimate 2 is made in Italy.

#	Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 /88%	Michelin CrossClimate 2 /89%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 133

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 81

Number of tests

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 14x

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 9x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 1.

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 1.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 8.

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 9.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2.89

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 4.36

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 2022

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 2022

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Good

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Good

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
91.3%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
83%

Snow handling

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 90%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 87%

Snow traction

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 93%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 78%

Snow braking

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 91%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 87%

Snow cornering

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 86%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
82.5%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
69.8%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 88%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 80%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 87%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 70%

Wet handling

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 88%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 71%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 87%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 73%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 87%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 71%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 ?

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
91.7%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
64.8%

Exterior noise

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 87%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 84%

Comfort

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 83%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 72 dB

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ? dB

Dry

(Overall rating)

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
88.8%

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
88.1%

Dry braking

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 96%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 86%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 85%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 84%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
67%

Michelin
CrossClimate 2
58.6%

Rolling resistance

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 87%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 79%

Mileage

1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 56%

2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 53%

Price/value

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 68%

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 33%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 ?

2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2022 225/45 R17

Name
Best values in test	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Test winner	1
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Test winner	1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	42,1	48
Michelin CrossClimate 2	39,9	49,2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	2	2+	1-	3+
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2+	1-	3
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	1	1
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good	2	2	2	2	3
Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	1-	2+	1	2-
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37,6	50
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750	40,3	52,3
Michelin CrossClimate 2	37,6	53,9
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands