Pros and cons
- Exceptional handling on the wet
- Short braking distance on dry roads
- Short braking distance on wet roads
- Great handling on dry roads
- Low drive-by noise levels
- -
Competitors
### Kumho Ecsta HS52 Summer Tyre Performance Summary
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 has been the subject of various tests, showcasing its performance as a summer tyre across different road conditions and performance metrics. Notably, it's received commendations for its balanced performance on both dry and wet pavements, attributing to its secure driving qualities and safety.
#### Dry Performance
On dry roads, the Ecsta HS52 has demonstrated to offer very good handling, with some tests highlighting its short braking distances as a key strength. This attribute enhances the tyre's safety profile, reassuring drivers with its responsive braking capability. However, a critique has been made regarding the tyre's steering feedback, which in some cases, was deemed only satisfactory. Despite this, the tyre maintained a safe performance at the limit, making it a reliable choice for dry conditions.
#### Wet Performance
The tyre shines in wet conditions, providing good grip and controllable handling. Braking distances on wet surfaces are also commendably short, a feature that consistently positions the HS52 as a trustworthy companion in rainy weather. However, its aquaplaning resistance received mixed reviews, performing well longitudinally but showing room for improvement laterally.
#### Comfort and Environmental Impact
Comfort is where opinions diverge; the tyre offers a good comfort level according to some reports, yet others point out an average rolling comfort, indicating a sportier, firmer ride. When it comes to environmental considerations, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has been critiqued for its heavier weight which impacts its fuel efficiency negatively. Despite a good projected tread life and minimal wear which suggests a longer life span, its sustainability and overall environmental footprint were only rated satisfactorily due to manufacturing origins and the weight implications on efficiency.
#### Additional Observations
Pricing and longevity are among the HS52's praised attributes, presenting a good value for buyers interested in a robust summer tyre without breaking the bank. Its performance level across varied road conditions, paired with promising longevity and a favorable price point, crafts a compelling argument for its selection.
### Conclusion
In summation, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is a competitive option within the summer tyre segment, offering a blend of safety, performance on wet and dry roads, and value. While it faces some criticisms in terms of environmental impact and comfort, its strengths in grip, braking, and overall handling make it a worthy consideration for drivers prioritizing safety and performance.
Sizes
Kumho Ecsta HS52 is made in 88 sizes, starting from 175/65 R14 up to 245/45 R18.
Similar tires
Timeline
2022
Kumho Ecsta HS52 was launched and replaced Kumho Ecsta HS51.
2022
Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 2x (Autobild,...)
2023
Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 3x (ADAC,...)
2024
Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 4x (Autobild,...)
Achievements
Kumho Ecsta HS52 in tyre tests
All tyre tests where Kumho Ecsta HS52 was featured:
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
good
Ranked #5 of 20
Securing a commendable 5th place out of 20 participants, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 achieved a noteworthy final rating of 'Good.' This tire stood out for its impressive performance on both wet and dry surfaces, delivering short braking distances under these conditions, which directly contributed to its strong showing. It was particularly dominant in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking disciplines, showcasing its superior engineering in these critical safety aspects. Despite these strengths, the tire did not go without critique; its ride comfort was described as moderate, suggesting room for improvement in this area. However, given its competitive pricing, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers a compelling value proposition for drivers looking for reliable performance without breaking the bank.
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
good
Ranked #3 of 16
In a highly competitive field, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 impressively finished 3rd among 16 competitors, earning an overall rating of 'Good'. This tire stands out for its balanced performance, having demonstrated safe and reliable behaviors on both dry and wet roads. Notably, on dry surfaces, it provides excellent steering feedback and a reassuring level of safety at the limit, along with a commendable short braking distance. Despite its slight weaknesses in aquaplaning resistance and a heavier tire weight, its performance on wet roads remains commendable, offering good grip and controllability along with strong braking and handling. However, it received only a satisfactory mark in aquaplaning situations. The tire also shined in terms of durability, showcasing very good predicted mileage and low wear, which contributes to its low fuel consumption, though its environmental performance was seen as satisfactory due to its higher weight and the sustainability aspect of its production received a limited rating. Specifically excelling in disciplines such as "mileage" and "Wet circle cornering," the Kumho Ecsta HS52 demonstrates its strengths in longevity and wet performance. Conversely, it ranked last in "Aquaplaning - longitudinal" and "Exterior noise," indicating areas for potential improvement. Despite these minor drawbacks, its strong overall performance marks it as a commendable choice for consumers looking for a reliable and durable summer tire.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 2,8 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 87 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 84 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
good
Ranked #8 of 50
Finishing 8th out of 50 competitors, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 achieved a commendable distinction for its performance, earning a final rating of "Good." This tire displayed a well-rounded competence, delivering reliable results on both dry and wet roads. Its braking distances were marked as good compared to other participants, especially noting its proficiency on wet surfaces with strong grip and confident maneuverability. However, it did report minor setbacks, including slight deficiencies in its environmental footprint, efficiency, and sustainability aspects. While it scored well for its longevity and wear, the increased weight of the tire detracted from its efficiency rating. Moreover, sustainability was rated merely as satisfactory, primarily due to its production origin. Despite these areas for improvement, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stood out for its safety on the road, confirming its solid standing among other contenders.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
good
Ranked #6 of 21
Securing a commendable third position out of a pool of 21 competitors, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 showcased an impressive performance. This tyre, cherished for its new summer tread profile, strikes a balance with its comprehensive performance capabilities. Noteworthy are its short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, coupled with good comfort and a favorable cost-to-performance ratio. However, it's not without its drawbacks, as some delay in steering response was observed. Distinctly, it excelled outstandingly in dry braking, alongside being lauded for its price-to-value proposition, marking it as a strong contender in its category.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Test ratings distribution
| 85% (5x) | |
|---|---|
| Good | Recommended |
| 4x | 1x |
Ratings x Wheel size
| R16 | R17 |
|---|---|
| 85% (3x) | 85% (2x) |
Ratings x Width
| 205/xx Rxx | 215/xx Rxx |
|---|---|
| 85% (3x) | 85% (2x) |