• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Michelin Primacy 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the Primacy 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the Michelin Primacy 4 also have A wet ratings.

# Yokohama Bluearth AE-50
/0%
Michelin Primacy 4
/77%

Add to comparison

Yokohama
Michelin
DimensionsR14 - R19 R14 - R23
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test264137129
Yokohama Bluearth AE-5019977122
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: Highly recommended
247127120
Show test details
Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test277142135
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50235114121
Michelin Primacy 4
Rating: -
252118134
Show test details