14 shops, 56 847 products

|

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Firestone Roadhawk

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings.

#	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Roadhawk 161

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

Worst position in test

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

Average position in tests

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

2. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

64%

Firestone
Roadhawk

61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 A

2. Firestone Roadhawk A

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Roadhawk

92%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

88%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

83%

Firestone
Roadhawk

78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

2. Firestone Roadhawk ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

48%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 C

2. Firestone Roadhawk C

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	264	137	129
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	199	77	122
Firestone Roadhawk	121	75	121
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	34,5	34,3
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	37,7	40,2
Firestone Roadhawk	35,2	36,5
Show test details