Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Apollo Aspire XP

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Apollo (29%). But when it comes to comparing Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 and Apollo Aspire XP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Apollo Aspire XP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Bluearth AE-50 and the Aspire XP were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 /0%	Apollo Aspire XP /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Yokohama Bluearth AE-50

/0%

Apollo Aspire XP

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R19

R16 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Upper-middle

2. Apollo Aspire XP Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Apollo Aspire XP 51

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 12

Number of tests

1. Apollo Aspire XP 9x

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6x

Best position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP 4.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 6.

Worst position in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP 14.

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 22.

Average position in tests

1. Apollo Aspire XP 8.56

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 11.83

Year of the last test

1. Apollo Aspire XP 2020

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 2020

Best rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Exemplary

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Worst rating in test

1. Apollo Aspire XP Good

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 Weak

Wet

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP

75%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

65%

Wet braking

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 71%

2. Apollo Aspire XP 67%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Apollo Aspire XP 80%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Apollo Aspire XP 95%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Apollo Aspire XP 82%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 A

2. Apollo Aspire XP ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

86%

Apollo
Aspire XP

79%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 93%

2. Apollo Aspire XP 90%

Dry braking

1. Apollo Aspire XP 83%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 78%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Apollo
Aspire XP

84%

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

84%

Exterior noise

1. Apollo Aspire XP 90%

2. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 85%

Comfort

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 83%

2. Apollo Aspire XP 78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 ?

2. Apollo Aspire XP ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
Bluearth AE-50

79%

Apollo
Aspire XP

59%

Rolling resistance

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 79%

2. Apollo Aspire XP 59%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 C

2. Apollo Aspire XP ?

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	264	137	129
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	199	77	122
Apollo Aspire XP	211	101	110
Show test details

Autozeitung Summer tyre test 2019 235/45 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	277	142	135
Yokohama Bluearth AE-50	235	114	121
Apollo Aspire XP	216	101	115
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama Bluearth AE-50 vs. Apollo Aspire XP

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands