Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Vredestein (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 91% compared to 70% of the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R18 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||