Segment
1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV were tested.
| # | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
