Segment
1. Tomket Sport Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Tomket Sport vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
| # | Tomket Sport
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Here, we compare two summer tyres, the Tomket Sport and the Fulda EcoControl HP2. A stark contrast is seen in our rating, with the Tomket Sport attaining a rather low 12% and the Fulda EcoControl HP2 boasting a significantly higher 69%.
Tomket Sport is a product of Tomket. Despite its low rating, it impresses with its efficiency and low wear in specific conditions. Its strengths were observed in Autobild 2024's test, where it was praised for being lightweight and efficient, showing reduced wear. However, the tyre also displays several weaknesses. It was critiqued for its balance and performance on both dry and wet terrain, notably having a weakness in the sustainability department. Pitting it against other models in tests, Tomket Sport often ends up in the lower spectrum, ranking 49 out of 53 in Autobild's test and 37 out of 50 in ADAC's.
Fulda EcoControl HP2 by Fulda succeeds its previous model, Fulda EcoControl HP. Performing consistently in tests, it often lands in the upper range. It secured the 20th position in a test hosted by Autobild out of a total of 53 tyres. Its best features were identified as its exterior noise, and performance during cross aquaplaning. The same test by Autobild in 2024 hailed it as a great choice for environmentally-conscious consumers, noting attributes such as good mileage and efficiency. Despite these positives, Fulda EcoControl HP2 shows weaknesses on wet roads.
In a comparison, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 clearly dominates over the Tomket Sport. It shows better performance as a summer tyre with a higher rating and generally places better in tests. But, individual preferences and requirements could swing the favour in Tomket Sport's direction, such as if one values lightness and low wear over other performance factors.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Tomket Sport 16.
Worst position in test
2. Tomket Sport 49.
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tomket Sport | 38,6 | 33,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Tomket Sport Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Tomket Sport | 39,0 | 39,2 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
