Comparison: Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05 vs. Bridgestone Duravis All Season
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Rotalla allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Bridgestone (60%). In this particular case, the Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05 has a better rating of 63% compared to 31% of the Bridgestone Duravis All Season. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/75 R16 test, where both the Setula Van 4 Season RA05 and the Duravis All Season were tested.
| # | Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Duravis All Season Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotalla Setula Van 4 Season RA05 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Duravis All Season Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
