Segment
1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Lowcost2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 vs. Linglong Green-Max
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Linglong summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Rotalla (0%). But when it comes to comparing Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 and Linglong Green-Max, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Linglong Green-Max first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the SETULA S-PACE RU01 and the Green-Max were tested.
| # | Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01
| Linglong Green-Max
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Rotalla SETULA S-PACE RU01 | 184 | 76 | 108 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
