Segment
1. Rotalla RH 01 Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: Rotalla RH 01 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Rotalla) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Rotalla (0%). The first tyre test of Rotalla RH 01 was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the RH 01 and the N Fera Primus were tested.
| # | Rotalla RH 01
| Nexen N Fera Primus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Worst position in test
2. Rotalla RH 01 44.
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Rotalla RH 01 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Rotalla RH 01 66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Rotalla RH 01 76%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Rotalla RH 01 79%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Rotalla RH 01 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Rotalla RH 01 65%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Rotalla RH 01 Rating: Poor | 3,2 | ||||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
