Segment
1. Norauto Prevensys 4 Lowcost2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Norauto Prevensys 4 vs. Gt Radial Fe2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Norauto) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt). Generally, Norauto summer tyres are slightly better rated (45%) than Gt (37%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Prevensys 4 and the Radial Fe2 were tested.
| # | Norauto Prevensys 4
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Norauto Prevensys 4 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Norauto Prevensys 4 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 3,2 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
