Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 52% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
# | Nokian WR Snowproof | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
Show test details |