• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (43%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 52% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.

# Nokian WR Snowproof
/57%
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
/52%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test29,224
Nokian WR Snowproof32,224,6
Yokohama BluEarth winter V90532,526
Show test details