Segment
2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Table of contents:
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we compare two standout models in the tyre industry: the Nokian Powerproof and the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. Both models are built for summer and offer unique strengths and weaknesses.
The Nokian Powerproof
Made in Finland, the Nokian Powerproof is a trustworthy option rated 51% by us. While it doesn't come from a line of previous models, it has been replaced by a newer version, the Nokian Powerproof 1. In various tests, the Nokian Powerproof consistently ranked in the middle, highlighting strengths in areas such as wet braking and handling on gravel. Noise levels were also notably low.
The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
From the respected brand GoodYear, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 builds upon its predecessor, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3. It has been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. This tyre, manufactured in Slovenia and Germany, boasts an outstanding rating of 80% from us.
In a variety of tests, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently outperformed the Powerproof, often securing the top spot. It excelled particularly in "Aquaplaning - cross," "Wet braking," and other areas of wet performance. This tyre also displayed strengths in dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise level, comfort, mileage, and even price/value.
Comparison Summary
In comparison tests, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 consistently ranked higher than the Nokian Powerproof, snagging a first-place position in tests conducted by Autozeitung, AutoMotorSport, and Autobild. In terms of features, the GoodYear Eagle tyre proved to be the superior choice, showing exceptional performance in both wet and dry conditions, with a bonus in mileage and price/value.
The Nokian Powerproof, on the other hand, showed its strength in interior noise control and wet performance, though it didn't perform as consistently across all test areas. Overall, while the Nokian Powerproof is a solid tyre, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 seems to offer a more consistent and superior performance across the board.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Test winner | 92 | 93 | 92 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 6,8 | 7,8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good | 9,4 | 9,2 | 6 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
