Segment
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (61%). The first tyre test of Nokian Line was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Line and the Roadhawk were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Line dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Firestone Roadhawk also have A wet ratings. We also know where Line is made - Finland.
# | Nokian Line
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Line Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Nokian Line 17.
2. Nokian Line 12.17
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian Line Good
1. Nokian Line Good2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Nokian Line Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Nokian Line | 37,5 | 38 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Show test details |