Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Bridgestone (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 88% of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6. Important for this comparison is also the ACE 2024 215/50 R18 test, where both the CrossClimate 2 SUV and the Turanza All Season 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 62 | 66 | 52 | 26 | |||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 62 | 58 | 44 | 26 | |||
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 59 | 43 | 19 | |||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |