Segment
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The following comparison between the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is based on numerous tests and user reviews.
Laufenn's S Fit EQ+ LK01 does not seem to replace any previous models and has no newer model replacing it. Unfortunately, there's no available information regarding its specific subType, country of manufacture and whether it was originally used as first equipment. In terms of performance, it came 21st out of 51 in the Autobild test and 14th out of 17 in the ADAC test. However, there's no specific rating on our page for this tyre.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2, on the other hand, is a summer tyre replacing the earlier version, Sava Intensa UHP. This specific model does not appear to have been replaced by a newer model. Its performance across multiple tests is commendable, securing the 15th position out of 51 in the Autobild test and the 12th spot among 17 in the ADAC tests. The Intensa UHP 2 is highly recommended for its impressive noise reduction according to the ADAC tests. Other plus points as per Autobild 2022 and ADAC 2021 include good safety during aquaplaning, stable driving behaviour on dry tracks, short braking distances in both wet and dry conditions and a rather comfortable drive. It also comes at a cheaper price point. The only notable cons, however, are a slightly increased wear and weaknesses on wet roads. On our page, it has a positive rating of 67%.
Overall, considering Sava's better performance in tests and rating, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 appears to be a more recommendable choice especially for those aiming for a quieter ride. But the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 still holds potential with its competitive performance in tests. Careful consideration of driving conditions and personal preferences should guide the final decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 34.9 | 29.7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 66.3 | 29.6 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 36,5 | 31,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
