Segment
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Laufenn (49%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has a better rating of 61% compared to 49% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the Weather Control A005 EVO were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO has A rating.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 52,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
