Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber allround tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (65%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Kleber Quadraxer 2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kleber Quadraxer 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Quadraxer 2 were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Kleber Quadraxer 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.332. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 44,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
