Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (65%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a better rating of 88% compared to 65% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (96%) of the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
