Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Kumho (61%). The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 66% of Bridgestone Turanza T005 has A rating.
| # | Kumho PorTran CW51
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended
