Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 48% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B rating.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R24 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
Continental EcoContact 6 | 36,4 | 32,7 | |||||
Show test details |