Segment
2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has a better rating of 68% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the SNOW and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings.
# | Kormoran SNOW | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
Kormoran Snow | 39,1 | ||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Show test details |