18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Imperial SnowDragon UHP vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Imperial (11%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 17% of the Imperial SnowDragon UHP. The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Imperial
SnowDragon UHP
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
6
49
Best position
#9
#1
Average position
24.7
3.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
68
244

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry driving behavior
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Dry handling - objective
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Safety
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Wet
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Wet braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Wet circle cornering
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Wet handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow acceleration
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow cornering
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow handling
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Snow traction
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Ice
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Ice braking
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Comfort
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Comfort
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Exterior noise
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Costs
Confidence
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Rolling resistance
Imperial SnowDragon UHP
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2020205/55 R16View
Tyre ReviewsTyre Reviews
Winter
2021225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.