Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Laufenn S Fit EQ
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this tyre comparison, we will be looking at two summer tyre models: the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Laufenn S Fit EQ. Both tyres are manufactured by leading companies, Hankook and Laufenn, respectively.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, with a rating of 74%, is designed for UUHP (Ultra-Ultra-High Performance). Originally made in Korea, this tyre model's first-use equipment included luxury vehicles such as the Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3. To date, there has not been a newer version to replace this model.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127's performance in tyre tests has been highly commendable. In a recent Autobild test consisting of a total of 53 different tyres, it ranked an impressive third place. This highlights the tyre's strong capacity in providing excellent performance and steady handling during summer conditions.
In contrast, the Laufenn S Fit EQ, with a rating of 46%, is yet to determine a subtype. There is currently no data available regarding its place of manufacture or first-use equipment. Similar to the Hankook Ventus S1, this tyre model has not been replaced with a newer model.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ's performance in the Autobild tyre test was less impressive, placing 44th out of 53. This suggests that the tyre's performance and handling, at least in a summer setting, may not be as reliable or efficient compared to its competitor.
In conclusion, based on our tests, and keeping noticeable factors such as the Autobild results and tyre ratings in mind, it appears that the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 overall performs better than the Laufenn S Fit EQ during summer conditions. In addition, the former being a UUHP suitable for luxury vehicles adds more value to its profile. It is, therefore, recommended to consider these aspects when choosing between these two tyres.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn S Fit EQ 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ | 34 | 32,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ | 37,5 | 37,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
