Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Hankook (79%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A has a better rating of 95% compared to 94% of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 X H750A and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV also have B wet ratings.
# | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |