Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Michelin ALPIN 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than GT (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 67% compared to 66% of the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo. The first tyre test of GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Sufficient | 2.9 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
