Segment
1. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 vs. Nokian WR C3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than GT (38%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 has a better rating of 40% compared to 27% of the Nokian WR C3. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the Radial Maxmiler WT2 and the WR C3 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 | Nokian WR C3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended2. GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR C3 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT Radial Maxmiler WT2 Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||