Segment
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). The first tyre test of Gt Radial Fe2 was done in 2023, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Fe2 and the Alnac 4G were tested.
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
1. Gt Radial Fe2 16.52. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
1. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Wet braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 75%
Wet circle cornering
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
Wet handling
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
2. Gt Radial Fe2 79%
Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 80%
Dry handling
1. Gt Radial Fe2 71%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Gt Radial Fe2 65%
Mileage
1. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
