Segment
2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than GoodYear (78%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 has a better rating of 88% compared to 80% of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV. The first tyre test of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 225/50 R18 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 and the CrossClimate SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate SUV also have B wet ratings.
# | GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |