Segment
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV vs. Nokian Powerproof SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV has a better rating of 55% compared to 42% of the Nokian Powerproof SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 255/55 R18 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV and the Powerproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Powerproof SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV | Nokian Powerproof SUV | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Nokian Powerproof SUV 73 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||