Segment
1. Goodride SW612 Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW612 vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (33%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW612 and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SW612 and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested.
| # | Goodride SW612
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
