Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Giti (47%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 55% of the Giti Gitiwinter W2. The first tyre test of Giti Gitiwinter W2 was done in 2021, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the winter W2 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Giti Gitiwinter W2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 85 | 113 | 129 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 145 | 136 | 122 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 38 | 29,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
