Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (62%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda SportControl and Nokian zLine, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fulda SportControl was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the SportControl and the zLine were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Fulda SportControl has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian zLine has A rating.
| # | Fulda SportControl
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Fulda SportControl Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Fulda SportControl Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Fulda SportControl Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,9 | 1,3 | 3,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
