Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 3
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Semperit Speed-Life 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The following comparison is between the summer types of the Fulda SportControl 2 and the Semperit Speed-Life 3 tyres. Both are highly sought after for their individual strengths and there is a clear differentiation of performance according to the tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC.
Contrasting the Fulda SportControl 2 and the Semperit Speed-Life 3, the former has a rating of 74% as per our evaluation while the latter has been accorded a rating of 59%. The Fulda SportControl 2 outperforms the Semperit Speed-Life 3 significantly in the Autobild test, standing at position 13 out of 51, as compared to the Speed-Life 3 which was positioned at number 43.
According to the ADAC 2018 data, the Fulda SportControl 2 poses advantages such as short braking distances on both dry and wet tracks, good aquaplaning reserves, and impressive cost-performance rate. The downsides associated with it are its slow steering response and mediocre mileage.
On the other hand, Semperit Speed-Life 3, a successor to the Semperit Speed-Life, displays a decent performance on wet tracks, very high prognosticated mileage, low wear, and good efficiency. Nevertheless, it falls short in dry lane manageability.
In the ADAC assessment, both tyres ranked closer, with the Fulda SportControl 2 taking 7th position and the Semperit Speed-Life 3 securing the 14th position among the 16 tyres evaluated. Despite the positional difference, both tyres have respective strengths.
In conclusion, while the Fulda SportControl 2 leads the charge in terms of overall performance factors and rankings in mutual testing positions, the Semperit Speed-Life 3 holds up impressively in certain parameters, such as high predicted mileage and low wear, proving to be a worthy option for long-term usage.
For more information about the manufacturers, visit Fulda and Semperit.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.072. Semperit Speed-Life 3 17.77
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 | 37.4 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 3,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 | 71.2 | 31.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Life 3 | 40 | 33,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
