Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
# | Fulda SportControl 2
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Fulda SportControl 2 and the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 are two summer tyres that have been put to the test in various trials. In this text, we will compare the strengths and weaknesses of both tyres based on these evaluations.
The Fulda SportControl 2, manufactured by Fulda, scores a 69% rating by our site. This model does not have any predecessor or successor tyres. According to Autobild, the Fulda SportControl 2's top features include exterior noise, comfort, and rolling resistance. It ranked 12th out of 50 tires in Autobild's testing. However, the ADAC test pointed out some weaknesses, namely extended wet braking distances and slightly delayed steering response. Still, it demonstrated balanced safe handling characteristics on wet roads and is competitively priced.
On the other hand, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5, manufactured by Maxxis and made in China, attains a slightly higher rating of 74% from our experts. The tyre is also part of the UHP (Ultra High Performance) subcategory. ADAC's test showed that the Victra Sport 5 has good safety reserves in aquaplaning situations and displays safe dynamic wet handling. Autobild's test confirmed these findings, putting the Victra Sport 5 in 20th place out of 50 tyres. The negative points to note are the average tyre mileage and significantly delayed steering response.
Overall, both the Fulda SportControl 2 and the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The verdict will largely depend on individual preferences of drivers: whether they prioritize comfort and quiet operation, or performance during wet conditions. Based on our ratings, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 is fractionally better rated than the Fulda SportControl 2. However, considering the lower price of the latter, some may opt for the Fulda SportControl 2 for its better value.
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 33.9 | 29.2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 60.8 | 26.7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 34,8 | 33,4 | |||||
Show test details |