Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Fulda SportControl 2 and the Bridgestone Turanza 6 showcase differing characteristics in their performance as summer tyres, as seen in numerous tests and reviews. Our own ratings reflect this, with the SportControl's score at 69% against the Turanza 6's 77%. This comparative review should assist in deciding which model suits your tyre needs.
The Fulda SportControl 2, produced by Fulda, has proven to be a reliable tyre, offering secure driving characteristics on dry road surfaces. It stands out for its light weight and low fuel consumption, signifying potential long-term savings. However, it faces criticisms on driving comfort on dry roads and slight weaknesses on wet surfaces. A common concern lies with the tyre's extended wet braking distance and slightly delayed steering response. These factors seem to have affected its test standings, such as a 7th place out of 16 in the ADAC test and 18th out of 50 in the Autobild contest.
On the other hand, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 from Bridgestone shines in areas where the SportControl struggles. It demonstrates good aquaplaning properties and has garnered positive remarks for interior noise levels. In the Turanza 6, Bridgestone offers excellent predicted tyre life as well as low fuel consumption. Some weak areas are flagged, notably the performance on both dry and wet roads. Unlike the SportControl 2, the Turanza 6 climbs higher in the ADAC and Autobild tests with 6th and 16th places consecutively.
In conclusion, while both sports tyres have distinct strengths and weaknesses, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 edges out the Fulda SportControl 2 in both our ratings and varied test results thanks to its superior performance in fuel efficiency and noise reduction. The Turanza 6's better standings in direct comparisons highlight its favourable attributes and level of customer satisfaction.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
