Segment
1. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda MultiControl
| Viking Fourtech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In our thorough tyre comparison, we will delve into two significantly renowned all-round tyre models: Fulda MultiControl and Viking Fourtech.
Starting with the Fulda MultiControl, although we haven't yet assigned it a comprehensive rating, it holds its merit as an all-round performer. The tyre has not been replaced by a new model, thus still valid for its overall performance longevity. Being a product of the well-known Fulda, you can surely expect decent standards from this model.
On the other side of the coin, we have the Viking Fourtech, which currently holds an our rating of 45%. This model is also a robust all-round performer. It also has not been replaced by a newer model. Viking Fourtech is a product of Viking, another reputable tyre manufacturer.
In an auto tyre test performed by Autobild, among 27 tested tyres, Fulda MultiControl landed at the 13th position, falling just slightly above the average range. The Viking Fourtech, moreover, was positioned 15th, just two places behind the Fulda MultiControl.
The strong suit of Viking Fourtech has been observed in two significant domains: Aquaplaning - cross and Rolling resistance, which reflects the tyre's optimal performance in wet conditions by reducing the risks associated with aquaplaning and its cost-effectiveness attributed to the low rolling resistance respectively.
To sum up, both the Fulda MultiControl and Viking Fourtech are substantial contestants in the all-round tyre category. The choice among the two mainly depends on the specific conditions and prerequisites, hence the most suitable option may vary. However, considering the overall test results, the Viking Fourtech appears to have a slight edge given its outstanding characteristics in Aquaplaning and Rolling resistance domains.
Whether you are leaning towards Viking Fourtech for its performance in wet conditions and low rolling resistance, or Fulda MultiControl for its commendable ranking in the auto tyre test, both options bring a unique set of features on the table which cannot be disregarded when picking the right tyre.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda MultiControl 23.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,5 | 58,6 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44,5 | 54,8 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 45,3 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 46 | 53,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 47,4 | 50,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
