Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda MultiControl
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to choosing the right tyre for your vehicle, the battle often falls between the Fulda MultiControl and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Recent studies and tests reveal distinguishing aspects about these two products from renowned manufacturers <Fulda> and Kumho.
The Fulda MultiControl tyre is a type of allround tyre with a rating of 6%. Despite it being in the 26th position in the Autobild test of 32 tyres, it still stands out as a reliable option for motorists. Its sturdy construction ensures optimal handling on various road surfaces. Notably, it has not been replaced by another model.
On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, made in China, is also an allround tyre but with a significant rating of 64%. It holds the impressive 10th position in the Autobild test of 32 tyres, an indication of its superior performance compared to the Fulda MultiControl. Furthermore, Kumho HA32 Solus 4S's best features in the Autobild test include Exterior noise, Snow braking, Mileage, Price/value, and another mention of Exterior noise.
Reviews from autobild 2020 to 2023 reveal the strengths of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S as stable driving behavior, good traction, and short braking distances on snow. Other plus points include its high mileage, good economy, noise-free operation, dynamic wet and dry handling, and a reasonable price.
Conversely, the same tests mention its drawbacks as extended wet/dry braking distances and moderate aquaplaning reserves. Additionally, the 2020 autobild indicates the tyre has a low mileage, high rolling resistance, and satisfactory price-performance ratio.
In conclusion, when comparing these two tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S outperforms the Fulda MultiControl in various tests. It manifests higher ratings, better features, and stronger appraisal from autobild examinations, making it a more suitable tyre choice for consumers in the market.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.782. Fulda MultiControl 23.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44.2 | 54.9 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 51,1 | 56,3 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,5 | 58,6 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44,5 | 54,8 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
