Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Matador (33%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Kristall Control HP and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Fulda Kristall Control HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Control HP
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
