Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Firestone (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has a better rating of 88% compared to 60% of the Firestone Winterhawk 4. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/60 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 4 and the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A also have B wet ratings. We also know where Winterhawk 4 is made - Italy.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | 125 | 123 | 115 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
Show test details |