Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Firestone (50%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 58% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 has C rating. We also know where Winterhawk 4 is made - Italy.
| # | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended