• 8 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Firestone (64%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 87% compared to 71% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings.

# Firestone Roadhawk
/71%
Nokian WetProof
/87%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Enviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test1,31,8
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2,72,8
Nokian Wetproof
Rating: Good
2,92,0
Show test details
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,23,02,02,3
Nokian Wetproof
Rating: Satisfactory
2,1 2,22,72,52,6
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test1-2+1
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Good
2+2+ 3
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Satisfactory
223
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,129,6
Firestone Roadhawk35,731,6
Nokian Wetproof35,131,7
Show test details
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test111
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2-2-
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Good
2+2+2
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
Firestone Roadhawk35,232
Nokian WetProof35,229,7
Show test details