Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Firestone (64%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 87% compared to 71% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WetProof also have A wet ratings.
# | Firestone Roadhawk | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.622. Firestone Roadhawk 12.28
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB2. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | ||||
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
Nokian WetProof | 35,2 | 29,7 | |||||
Show test details |