Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Cooper Zeon CS8
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Cooper Zeon CS8
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Firestone Roadhawk and Cooper Zeon CS8 are both summer tyres that have seen rigorous testing from top automotive resources. In comparing these two tyre models, it is crucial to take into account their respective ratings, performance, and test results.
Firestone Roadhawk
Rated highly by us at 72%, the Firestone Roadhawk has shown its strengths in various tests. For example, during an Autobild test, it came in 3rd out of 51 tyres. It was praised for dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guide, making it a versatile choice. On the other hand, it was noted on Autobild 2019 for being good on dry roads and having lower abrasion but having weaknesses on wet roads and in terms of durability.
Cooper Zeon CS8
The Cooper Zeon CS8, manufactured in GB by Cooper, received a 56% rating from us. In the same Autobild test, it secured the 13th position. Its performance on wet roads was noted as satisfactory in Autobild 2019, but it was criticized for being unbalanced with noticeable weaknesses on dry roads. Environmental efficiency, tyre lifespan, and wear resistance were also points of concern.
Comparison
In a direct comparison, the Firestone Roadhawk seems to perform better overall and ranks higher in tests. While it excels in both dry and wet handling, the Cooper Zeon CS8 shows more significant weaknesses, particularly in dry conditions. In another test by ADAC, the Firestone Roadhawk ranked 4th out of 16 tyres, while the Cooper Zeon CS8 ranked 14th.
Verdict
In conclusion, the Firestone Roadhawk appears to be the stronger of the two tyres, with better overall performance and fewer weaknesses according to testing. This is not to say the Cooper Zeon CS8 isn't a good tyre, but it seems to have more areas for improvement. While both these tyres do not have newer models to replace them yet, we hope any future versions will address the mentioned weak points.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Cooper Zeon CS8 19.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Cooper Zeon CS8 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon CS8 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,9 | 33,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Sufficient | 3,3 | 3,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 65.4 | 27.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 39,1 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 38,0 | 34,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,3 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 | 37,7 | 37,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Cooper Zeon CS8 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 3,2 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
