Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Fulda MultiControl
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Multiseason 2
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The two tyres we're comparing today are the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Fulda MultiControl. The Firestone Multiseason 2, which is made in Italy and falls into the category of winter tyres, has an overall rating of 60% by our team. On the other hand, the Fulda MultiControl tyre does not have an overall rating yet.
When the two tyres were tested by AutoBild, the Firestone Multiseason 2 was consistently positioned better. They ranked 22 out of 37 in AutoBild's first test and climbed notably higher in the following test, securing the 6th place out of 32 tyres. In contrast, the Fulda MultiControl tended to rank slightly lower, with positions 27 and 26, respectively.
The Firestone Multiseason 2 boasts some significant strengths such as low rolling resistance, fair price/value ratio, and good snow traction. When it comes to performance, this tyre has been praised for its short snow and wet braking distances, high mileage, and low rolling resistance. However, its weaknesses include mediocre lateral control on snow, limited safety reserves in corner aquaplaning, and extended dry braking distance.
Meanwhile, no specific strengths or weaknesses have been released for the Fulda MultiControl yet, which is an all-round tyre. It doesn't seem to have replaced any previous models nor has it been replaced by a newer model.
In conclusion, while both tyres bring something to the table, it seems that the Firestone Multiseason 2 appears to have an edge in terms of consistent test rankings and specific test features. However, users may need to consider their specific terrain and driving conditions to choose the most suitable tyre. You can check out the tyres on the official websites of Firestone and Fulda for more information.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda MultiControl 23.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 64.0 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44.4 | 65.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41.8 | 47.9 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44.2 | 54.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 45,9 | 48,9 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 51,1 | 56,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 42,4 | 54,1 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,5 | 58,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41,2 | 49,3 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 44,5 | 54,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
