Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Esa-Tecar (0%). The first tyre test of Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Super Grip Pro and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested.
| # | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 0,8 | 2,3 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
