Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Debica (45%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto HP2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 82% of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Dynaxer HP4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Presto HP2 | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.582. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Debica Presto HP2 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 37,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | ||||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||