Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 55% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 61% of Debica Frigo HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings.
# | Debica Frigo HP2 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB2. Debica Frigo HP2 72 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
Show test details |